What is NLP? (Neuro-Linguistic
Programming)
From your point of view, NLP provides simple effective techniques
that help to enable you to make the changes you want to.
However, for those of you who would like a little
more information regarding the 'principles' of NLP this page provides
them. There are so many differing definitions of what NLP is that
I think it simpler to give you Richard Bandler's (one of the co-creators
of NLP) words.
NLP is an attitude ... characterized by the sense
of curiosity and adventure and a desire to learn the skills to
be able to find out what kinds of communication influences somebody
and the kinds of things worth knowing ... to look at life as a
rare and unprecedented opportunity to learn.
NLP is a methodology ... based on the overall presupposition
that all behavior has a structure ... and that structure can be
modeled, learned, taught, and changed (re-programmed). The way
to know what will be useful and effective are the perceptual skills.
NLP has evolved as an innovative technology enabling
the practitioner to organize information and perceptions in ways
that allow them to achieve results that were once inconceivable. |
Neuro
Nervous system through which experience
is received and processed through the five senses.
Linguistic
Language and nonverbal communication systems through which
neural representations are coded, ordered, and given meaning.
Programming
The ability to organize our communication and neurological systems
to achieve specific desired goals and results. |
The Presuppositions of NLP
The meaning of the communication is the response you get.
All distinctions human beings
are able to make concerning our environment and our behavior can be
usefully represented through the visually, auditory, kinesthetic, olfactory
and gustatory senses.
The resources an individual needs
to effect a change are already within them.
The map is not the territory.
The positive worth of the individual
is held constant, while the value and appropriateness of internal and/or
external behavior is questioned.
There is a positive intention
motivating every behavior; and a context in which every behavior has
value.
Feedback vs. Failure - All results
and behaviors are achievements, whether they are desired outcomes for
a given task/context or not.
© Richard Bandler and the
Society of NLP
 |
What
is NLP? More details |
|
Nero-Linguistic Programming (NLP) studies the structure
of how humans think and experience the world. Obviously, the structure
of something so subjective does not lend itself to precise, statistical
formulae but instead leads to models of how these things work. From
these models, techniques for quickly and effectively changing thoughts,
behaviors and beliefs that limit you have been developed.
Many of the models in NLP were created by studying people who did
things exquisitely well. Models such as meta-model, metaprogram, sensory
acuity, Milton-model, representational systems and submodalities among
others, provide a diverse set of tools for creating change in yourself
and others.
Someone who wanted to create a model for learning to
drive a car really well, might approach a expert in the field something
like this - Instead of asking an expert driver, " How do you drive?"
("Very well, thank you."), they would be concentrating not
on the content of what they did but on the underlying structure such
as how they represent driving in their mind, the beliefs and attitudes
they had about driving, the strategies they used in making decisions.Let's
use something called submodalities as an example of how a model works.
By understanding how we perceive the world through our five senses,
we can then understand how some people can respond very resourcefully
in a situation and others do not. Once you learn how those who remain
resourceful set up their representations, then it's a simple matter
to teach others to do the same thing. The Example: Imagine seeing
an enormous spider dangling directly in front of your face. Now clear
your mind. A common way for people to have a phobic reaction to spiders
or anything related to them, is to picture a spider completely oversized
and far too close in their minds.
Spiders are tiny, well-mannered creatures that are far more frightened
of you than you should be of them but try telling that to someone with
that particular phobia. So, why don't these phobic people notice the
images they're creating? The popular belief is that we don't pay much
attention to what's going on in our unconscious. If you considered the
enormous amount of information your brain has to process each day, it's
probably best that we don't spend much time dwelling on it (otherwise,
we would probably sit around babbling and drooling and eventually starve
to death). NLPers ask the question, "If another person can have
fun playing with their pet spider, what can we learn about them that
we could teach the phobic person so they can play with spiders, too?".
The spider-lover would most likely have an image representing spiders
that was proportionally correct and at a reasonable distance and possibly
other factors not worth getting into right now. Knowing the difference,
the NLPer can use one of many techniques to help the phobic person relearn
their reaction to spiders so that it is similar in nature to the spider-lover's.
NLP is based on many useful presuppositions that support the attitude
that change is imminent. One of the most important is, NLP is about
what works, not what should work. In other words, if what you're doing
isn't working, try something else, anything else, regardless of whether
what you had been doing should have worked. Flexibility is the key element
in a given system, the one who is most likely to do well responds to
changing (or unchanging) circumstances. That's one reason NLP has made
so much progress in an area where such is not the norm. Innovators try
out things with little regard as to its "truth" or "reality",
NLP is much more interested in results and giving people what they want
from life (sappy yes, but "true" nonetheless). (Source unknown
- contact webmaster if author is known)
What is NLP? (Nero-Linguistic
Programming) ... Still more Info
|
Representational Systems & Submodalities
The representational systems in NLP are simply enough the five senses.
We represent the world using the visual (images), auditory (sounds),
kinesthetic (touch and internal feelings), gustatory (tastes) and olfactory
(smells) senses. We picture ourselves lying on a sunny beach, hear the
voice of the lifeguard yelling, feel the sensation only sand in your
bathing suit can produce, taste the soggy egg salad sandwiches we brought
for lunch and smell the aroma of the surf wafting into our nostrils.
Our thinking consists of these images, sounds, feelings and usually
to a lesser extent, tastes and smells. The entirety of our experiences
have been recreated through these senses in our memories and govern
our capabilities and beliefs. Curiously enough, our predominant representational
system in a given context often shows up in our language, for example:
Responding to the statement: I think the Jensen project is going well.
Visual: Yep, looks good to me.
Auditory: I been hearing good things about it.
Kinesthetic: I feel good about the whole project.
Olfactory: Smells like a winner to me.
Gustatory: I can taste the victory. It's no wonder smells and
tastes are less commonly used considering how hard they are to work
into conversation.
The qualities or attributes of the representations you make using your
five senses are submodalities. For example, make a picture of someone
you love in your mind. Now, make the colors more intense and notice
how it affects you response to it. Now make it black and white and notice
your response. Return it to its original shades and hue and bring the
image closer. Now move it farther out. Return the picture to its original
state, noticing how each of those experiments affected your response.
Submodalities are the fine tuning to your representations and can be
used to create powerful changes.
Meta-Model
Very simply, the meta-model is set of questions designed to find the
explicit meaning in a person's communication. For example: He hurt me.
Meta-Modeler: Who hurt you?
Bob hurt me.
Meta-Modeler: How did he hurt you?
He wouldn't take out the trash like I asked him to. Another example:
I can't believe he's like that!
Meta-Modeler: Who?
Mel Gibson.
Meta-Modeler: What's he like?
He's so amazingly gorgeous!
Meta-Modeler: Hey, what about me?! (oops, that not Meta-model)
Many of us would have assumed we knew what was meant by "He hurt
me." or "I can't believe he's like that", based on our
own experiences. By having the ability to find other people's meaning
in their communication, we can be more capable in communicating with
them.
Sensory Acuity
A person's thought process is very closely tied with their physiology.
A dog senses your fear: how did he know if you didn't tell him. If a
friend is depressed, most of us can tell without even talking with them.
We pick up clues from their body: slumped shoulders, eyes downcast,
head down, lack of animation (and in extreme cases, a loaded pistol
held to the head). Sensory acuity takes these observations beyond the
more obviously recognizable clues and uses the physical feedback in
addition to someone's words to gain as much from communication as possible.
Milton-Model
A set of linguistic patterns derived from Milton Erickson, the father
of modern hypnotherapy. These language patterns are used to help guide
someone without interfering with how they are experiencing it in their
minds. For example, "Think of time you were laughing." It
doesn't define when or how hard you were laughing so it applies to everyone
(I hope). The Milton-model helps with maintaining rapport and is often
used in hypnotic or trance state sessions.
Metaprogram's
Metaprogram's are filters through which we perceive the world. The old
maxim, is the glass half full or half empty (or just fluidics challenged)
is an example. Another example would be how two different people might
approach an argument. A person with what we would call an "away
from" strategy would be likely to be finding any way to get away
from the conflict. Someone using a "toward" strategy would
be more likely to be heading toward a specific goal, perhaps of finding
an amicable solution to the conflict. The primary difference between
the two being, when you're moving away from something, you never know
what you may back into.